Do you think it’s possible to find signals in collaboration (meta)data that someone is a good manager? Let’s give it some thought.
Many of you have probably already heard about Google’s Oxygen project and its findings on the factors differentiating the highest and lowest-rated managers based on performance reviews, employee engagement surveys, interviews, and other sources of employee feedback. The final list included the following eight characteristics:
Do you think it would be possible to find any signals, however weak, of the presence of some of these managers’ characteristics in the collaboration (meta)data?
Of the collaboration metrics we currently work with at Time is Ltd., I would bet on the following:
Would you agree? Or what other signals of a good manager would you look for in collaboration (meta)data?
P.S. In a later update, the list of top manager characteristics at Google also includes the characteristic “Collaborates across Google”, which is relatively straightforward to measure using collaboration data.
For attribution, please cite this work as
Stehlík (2022, Dec. 17). Ludek's Blog About People Analytics: Signals of a good manager. Retrieved from https://blog-about-people-analytics.netlify.app/posts/2022-12-17-good-manager/
BibTeX citation
@misc{stehlík2022signals, author = {Stehlík, Luděk}, title = {Ludek's Blog About People Analytics: Signals of a good manager}, url = {https://blog-about-people-analytics.netlify.app/posts/2022-12-17-good-manager/}, year = {2022} }