Bayesian networks seem to have some interesting properties that could make them useful for various people analytics use cases, but for some reason this is not the case.
In a people analytics project I’m involved in, we were asked to come up with a prediction model that would perform reasonably well while being very easy to understand and interpret for non-technical users.
In considering various options, we also came across Bayesian networks (BNs), probabilistic graphical models consisting of nodes and directed edges that represent conditional (and under certain assumptions, causal) relationships between random variables. They seem to have several interesting properties that would suit our needs, namely:
The attached graph is for illustrative purposes only - the output from early experiments with BNs on artificial IBM employee attrition data.
However, when searching for information about this method, we found that it is not particularly popular among people analytics and I/O psychology practitioners. Would anyone of the readers happen to have a good or bad experience using this tool and would also be willing to share it? 🙏
For attribution, please cite this work as
Stehlík (2023, June 1). Ludek's Blog About People Analytics: Use of Bayesian networks in people analytics?. Retrieved from https://blog-about-people-analytics.netlify.app/posts/2023-06-05-bayesian-networks-in-people-analytics/
BibTeX citation
@misc{stehlík2023use, author = {Stehlík, Luděk}, title = {Ludek's Blog About People Analytics: Use of Bayesian networks in people analytics?}, url = {https://blog-about-people-analytics.netlify.app/posts/2023-06-05-bayesian-networks-in-people-analytics/}, year = {2023} }